vendredi 30 septembre 2011
Complex consciousness
The enraged musician
mercredi 28 septembre 2011
Skilled.
What is a skill ?
I never gave much thoughts to this question before. I am a partisan of every kind of learning and a fierce believer that the mere notion of talent, that some people confuse with skill, is an aberration. Some people have biological abilities toward some technics, and some have learning at ease, thanks to some DNA segment of theirs chromosomes. But nothing compared to what is the common understanding of the idea of talent, which appears as some kind of fate-given mastering of a skill. The few times I heard someone saying “You are talented” to someone else, it made me mad. That some people choose to deny the tremendous amount of time and energy put into training is only an excuse for themselves no to try mastering this specific skill, would it be cooking or painting or singing. You just have to pay the price.
Mastering a skill requires time. Training period. Sometimes just a few hours, sometimes years. Is walking and standing up not a basic skill, but a skill nonetheless ? Surely everyone see babies with no capacity of commotion, and then see them crawling, then standing, then walking and running. Those who deny walking as a skill should be reminded not only of disabled people, but of other species. Each species masters its own skills according to their biological capacities. This obvious example raises some questions and answers that stand for the accepted idea of skill.
There are at least two kinds of skills: the job-related ones, that you have to learn to “survive” in the society, and the ones people develop as hobbies, out of a passion that grew inside them for some reason. I believe that one interesting achievement in someone's life would be that both those kinds connects in a way: being more and more passioned about your work or turning your mastering of your favorite skills into a job. This is certainly why I am studying painting, and arts more generally speaking.
One obvious aspect that stands out after discussing with people about their skills is the pleasure that accompanies the fact of being particularly skilled in something. You became passionated about something by discovering, studying its details and controlling them. Mastering a skill is a personal achievement that people are proud of. Indeed, it makes us more unique, since everyone does not share it and can not possibly do it because of the time and physical abilities it can require. Even though some people might be better at it or simply as good as you are, it makes you belong to a certain category, a class of people with specific abilities thus a better, more renowned, recognized social status. It is a competition, some being more aware of it and paying more attention to their entourage appreciation than others.
I often wondered if it would be better to be really skilled in one specific field, or have a wide range of skills less developed. Tricky, right ? I suppose there is some in-between level, and that is what I am personally looking for. The danger is to be carried away by a large number of interests which require appropriated skills. But the pleasure of being skilled lies in its very details, that one can aim to acknowledge and control only through a close and long relationship with it.
You could also dissociate technical abilities and intellectual ones. They complete each other and should be developed as such to obtain maximum self-satisfaction. It is great to sing really well, but wouldn't it be better – on a personal angle – to write yourself the songs you want to sing ? Not doing so can result in frustration regarding an incomplete pair of skills. Maybe this applies for myself only and can't be widespread. I am sure that a lot of strictly “intellectual” people and as least as much “manuel workers” are quite happy with their skills the way they are. I must be greedy.
Time and passion.